The Logie Baird, 8 James Street, Helensburgh,
G84 8AS
Copy letter dated 14th May 2019 from Brunton Millar, Solicitors, 22 Herbert Street, Glasgow on behalf of Kemble Estates Ltd.
Section 40 provides that, where a licence has been varied or suspended , the Licensing Board may revoke the variation or suspension if it is satisfied that such a course is justified by reason of a change of circumstances.
A copy of the
Statement of Reasons together with letter from Police Scotland dated 7th
February, list of incidents and the LSO’s Report on the Review is attached
Minutes:
The Logie Baird, 8 James Street, Helensburgh, G84 8AS
Archie
McIver, Solicitor, Glasgow appeared on behalf of the applicant. Cara Nikolic
and Milan Nikolic, the premises manager, were also present.
The Chair explained the procedure.
Mr McIver referred to Section 40 of the
Licensing (Scotland) Act 2005
which was an uncommon request, that a
Licensing Board may, if
satisfied, remove the variation if it
was justified there was a change in
circumstances, to restrict the terminal
hour to 1.00am with a curfew of
11.00pm. Mr McIver said that
attendances had fallen and on a Friday
evening there were no patrons within
the premises at all with Saturday
evenings following suit, as a result
the business was no longer
sustainable. He explained that in
April, when the decision to restrict the
opening hours was made, the premises
had been operating satisfactorily
from the festive period up until that
time, with one incident reported in
May which involved a fight between 2
males. They were both charged
and were added to the Pub Watch list
barring them from certain
premises for 2 years. Mr McIver advised
that his clients had improved
staff training; employed more male and
female stewards and updated
their CCTV. There were a number of
matters still to be put in place such
as scan net, which checks all ID and
detects any false ID and then this
information is added into the system.
He said that this would be
expensive to install therefore it would
only be worth it if patrons used the
premises.
Mr McIver said that a membership scheme
would be set up whereby
members only would be permitted after
10.00pm and if there were
any incidents then Police Scotland
would have access to information
relating to those individuals. He
emphasised that his clients needed to
have the opportunity to run a honest
establishment and the early
closure was having a ripple effect on
other premises which had been
recently having issues over unruly
behaviour. Mr McIver said that
if the Board was not in a position to
vary the terminal hour to 2.00am,
could they remove the curfew as the
premises were now closed as the
business was no longer viable. He
referred to the letter from the
landlords, which he was aware of but
did not have any comments to
make regarding this. He stressed that
his clients had learnt from their
mistakes.
Sergeant Mairi Capaldi, Police Scotland
advised that the issue was the
levels of intoxication. Mr McIver said
that this was addressed previously
and was not aware of any other
incidents apart from the one in May. He
confirmed that if a patron was
intoxicated then they would not be
permitted onto the premises again.
Milan Nikolic explained that the
incident involved 2 patrons who became
aggressive but they were not drunk and
were immediately removed from
the premises.
Sergeant Capaldi referred to the
changes which would be put in place
but thought that these would not change
anything.
Raymond Park, Licensing Standards
Officer suggested that a condition
could be added regarding the
implemented changes.
Richard Trail referred to the list of
incidents and said that the majority of
the narrative stated patrons were
intoxicated. Mr McIver accepted this
but these type of incidents had not
happened since the festive period.
The Chair referred to the last recorded
incident which took place on 20th
January 2019. Mr McIver advised there were
2 incidents but it was
nearly the end of June and nothing
further, apart from May, had
occurred. Mr Nikolic advised that the
Procurator Fiscal decided not to
proceed with one of the incidents.
Rory Colville reverted back to the
implemented changes and asked how
this would work for Navy Personnel as
they changed constantly
and how would the CCTV system, which
was not always available, be
managed.
Cara Nikolic said that it was the most
comprehensive CCTV in the area
and Police Scotland had requested, in
the past, to view it in relation to
other matters. She stated that the CCTV
was out of order for one night
but there had been no further issues
with it. Ms Nikolic said that a
number of staff members had access to
the CCTV before but now this
number had been limited. Mr McIver
referred to Navy Personnel and
stated that they should have their own
ID cards and if they did not
have them or were unwilling to show
them, they would not be allowed
entry.
Lorna Douglas thought that the scan net
would be more a security
measure rather than a management one
and had expressed her
concerns regarding this. She asked if
any recent incidents had taken
place and said it was difficult to
determine whether there had been any
improvement as the premises had been
closed. Sergeant Capaldi
advised that they were vast premises
but if stewarding was
improved, it would make a difference.
The Chair asked if there had been any
other reported incidents from
other premises but Mr Park said it was
more noise nuisance. Mr
McIver added that at the last Pub Watch
meeting in Helensburgh, it was
mentioned that 2 patrons had been
arrested outside the Clyde Bar for
disorder on 30th May which
was reported to Police Scotland. Sergeant
Capaldi confirmed this but did not have
any paperwork relating
to the incident.
Lorna Douglas asked Ms Nikolic how many
weekends had the premises
been operating under the restricted
terminal hour and she replied 7,
traded for 3 weeks then closed on
Friday evenings only then closed
premises one week ago.
On summing up, Mr McIver said that his
clients could only prove that the
changes would work if they were given
an opportunity to put them in
place.
Ms Nikolic referred to incidents at
other premises and added that military
personnel were involved in the majority
of incidents, therefore asked if
the Board could contact the Navy to
express their concerns.
Everyone agreed that they had a fair
hearing.
The Board adjourned to consider the
matter further. On resuming, the
Chair moved that the curfew of 11.00pm
be removed but the terminal
hour of 1.00am remain and a condition
to be added to change the
stewards. This would be reviewed again
at the November meeting
With no-one else being otherwise
minded, this became the decision of
the Board.
Supporting documents: