Venue: By Skype
Contact: Fiona McCallum Tel. No. 01546 604392
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Robin Currie, Roderick McCuish and Jean Moffat. |
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
CIVIC GOVERNMENT (SCOTLAND) ACT 1982: REQUEST FOR SUSPENSION OF TAXI DRIVER LICENCE (NO. 4274) (D MACINTYRE, OBAN) Report by Head of Legal and Regulatory Support Minutes: The Chair welcomed everyone to
the meeting. In line with recent
legislation for Civic Government Hearings, the parties (and any
representatives) were given the options for participating in the meeting today. The options available were by Video Call, by
Audio Call or by written submission. For
this meeting the licence holder’s representative opted to proceed by way of
written submission and Police Scotland opted to participate by audio call. At the hearing on 19 August 2020,
the Committee agreed to continue consideration of this matter in order to
request further information from parties about the incident to which the
suspension relates. Licence Holder Mr McMillan referred to the
written submission from the licence holder’s representative which had been
circulated in Supplementary Pack 1. Mr
McMillan read out the written submission and explained that the licence
holder’s representative was requesting further continuation until after a trial
date which had been set for 19 October 2020 in relation to a drink driving
charge. Mr McMillan advised that the
request was due to the fact that the information sought by the Committee
related closely to the charge and criminal proceedings and the licence holder’s
representative was fearful that any information disclosed prior to the trial
may prejudice the licence holder’s position and his right to a fair trial. The written submission had provided some
information such as the date of the offence and advised that the licence holder
had not been driving a taxi at the time.
Following the trial more information could be provided. Mr McMillan advised that due to
the circumstances, the request seemed reasonable and that a short continuation
would allow for a full explanation and would allow Members to consider all of
the facts. The Chair invited Sergeant Gall
to speak on behalf of Police Scotland. Police Scotland Sergeant Gall advised the
Committee that Police Scotland would be supportive of continuation until after
the trial as they could not disclose any information surrounding the charge
until this time. The Chair invited questions from
Members of the Committee. Questions/Debate Councillor Colville advised that
the next scheduled meeting of the Committee was 21 October and asked if the
outcome of the trial would be available by that date. Mr MacMillan advised that in terms of
paperwork, the Council were required to provide two weeks’ notice prior to
calling a hearing which may be too tight.
Mr McMillan suggested the Committee agree continuation until after the
outcome of the court proceedings rather than setting a particular date which
would mean that it could be brought back at the relevant time. Councillor Blair advised he had
serious concerns because even although clarity had been given that the licence
holder had not been driving a taxi, there was no clarity given over what
vehicle he had been driving and therefore it could have been a people carrier
or a minibus or other private hire vehicle.
Councillor Blair referred to the request by Police Scotland for
immediate suspension of the licence advising that he had zero tolerance in
respect of drink driving. Mr McMillan advised that the licence holder’s
representative did not feel at liberty to provide any further information about
the vehicle that was driven and Police Scotland could not provide that
information either at that time.
Councillor Blair advised that he had serious concerns over public safety
and that it worried him that Police Scotland had requested suspension of the
licence and the accused was still currently driving a taxi. Councillor Kinniburgh agreed with
Councillor Blair but referred to the intimation made by Police Scotland that
they had no objection to a continuation of the hearing until after the trial. Councillor Taylor expressed
frustration because the Committee had been asked to consider immediate
suspension but had been held back due to the legal process. Councillor Redman advised that he
would like to continue consideration until after the court date when all the
facts could be considered as he felt it would be unfair to pass judgement
without the full facts before them. Councillor Kinniburgh asked the
Committee to be aware that the Civic Government process and the court process
were different and, although it was highly unlikely, the Committee could take a
different view to that of the outcome of a court decision. Mr McMillan explained the difference between
the standards of proof required between a civil case and a criminal case and
suggested that the Committee continue consideration to allow full evidence to
come before the Committee. Councillor Blair asked if the
Committee had come to a decision to suspend the licence without the full facts
before them would they have been entitled to do this. Mr McMillan advised that they would have been
entitled to do this but the decision could be subject to challenge. Councillor Blair advised that he was at ease
with the comments made by Police Scotland about continuing consideration but at
the same time he did not want it to take away the regulatory role that the
Committee had. Councillor Devon advised that she
felt very strongly against drunk driving having lost family members to
this. She advised that she felt the
messages from the Police were contradictory as they had asked for immediate
suspension and then today advised that they were supportive of a continuation. Councillor Hardie agreed with
Councillor Devon and advised he shared Councillor Blair’s concerns. He advised that he would be inclined to
suspend the licence on the back of the request by the Police. Mr McMillan advised that the role
of the Police was to be a complainer and that they were required to make a case
to the Committee to back up the complaint.
He reminded the Committee that the Police had advised they were happy
with a short continuation to allow all the facts to become available in order
that they could make their case properly and effectively. Councillor Kinniburgh advised he had concerns about how these hearings were conducted due to the pandemic, which he had raised at the ... view the full minutes text for item 3. |