Venue: By Microsoft Teams
Contact: Hazel MacInnes Tel: 01546604269
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Minutes: There were no apologies for
absence. |
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Minutes: There were no declarations of
interest. |
|
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR Minutes: The
Committee Manager, having welcomed everyone to the meeting, invited the Panel
to nominate a Chair for the proceedings.
It was unanimously agreed to appoint Councillor Liz McCabe as Chair of
the Conduct Review Panel. |
|
LOCHGOIL COMMUNITY COUNCIL - COMPLAINT REFERRALS Report by Committee Manager, Legal and Regulatory Support Minutes: The Community Council Liaison Officer had received
3 separate complaints in relation to the conduct of Lochgoil Community Council
under paragraph 13.2.1 of the Scheme for the Establishment of Community
Councils in Argyll and Bute 2022. Prior to the consideration of business, the
Committee Manager advised that in terms of the procedural information provided
on pages 4 , 5 and 6 of the agenda pack, the panel required to deal with some
preliminary matters prior to the consideration of the detail of the 3
complaints before them. Referring to paragraph 5.2.3 of the report, the
Committee Manager advised that having reviewed the request from the Community
Council for confirmation of the identity of the complainant in Complaint 1, it
was recommended that the anonymity of the complainant was maintained as the
complaint related to a procedural matter.
The Panel agreed the recommendation that the anonymity of the
complainant be maintained. Referring to paragraph 5.2.4 of the report, the
Committee Manager advised that the Community Council had raised concern over
one aspect of Complaint 1 which referred specifically to the conduct of one
Community Councillor and not the Community Council as a whole, noting that this
did not fall under one of the categories that would allow the Panel to consider
it at this stage. The Committee Manager asked the Panel to consider this
particular aspect of complaint 1, specifically whether it be referred back to
the Community Council for consideration.
The Panel agreed to refer that aspect of complaint 1 back to the
Community Council for consideration. Referring to paragraph 5.4.2 of the report the
Committee Manager advised that there had been a request from the Community
Council that the part of complaint 3 suggesting that the theft and vandalism of
the complainants’ brown tourist signs was related to the Community Council
Meeting held on 13 February 2023 and / or the publication of a resignation
letter be ignored due to concern that this was a serious matter which could
adversely affect the reputations of members of the new Community Council. The Committee Manager asked the Panel to
consider the request from the Community Council that the Panel exclude this
part of Complaint 3 from their consideration as there were other avenues in
which this aspect of the complaint be dealt with. The Panel agreed to exclude this part of the
complaint from their consideration of Complaint 3. Having assumed the role of Chair, Councillor McCabe
advised that her first task was to establish whether members of the Panel had
sufficient information before them to discuss and determine the subject of the
complaint. The Panel agreed that they
had sufficient information before them to discuss and determine the subject of
the complaint. Having determined that they had sufficient
information before them to reach a view on the grounds of the referrals, the
Panel proceeded to discuss and determine whether the Community Council, on the
balance of probabilities, had failed to comply with and abide by the terms of
the Scheme of the Establishment of Community Councils, the constitution of
Lochgoil Community Council and the Code of Conduct for Community Council
Members. A summary of each complaint was provided together with a response from
the Community Council for ease of reference. Complaint 1 related to the conduct of half or more
of Lochgoil Community Council and the way in which the Community Council had
dealt with a planning application by Loch Long Salmon which had been considered
by Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority. There were 9 parts to
Complaint 1 with a summary of the complaint and the response from the Community
Council detailed at Appendix 2.1 of the submitted report. Complaint 2 related to the conduct of half or more
of Lochgoil Community Council and had been submitted by a representative of Loch
Lomond Salmon. The complaint referred to
the way in which the Community Council had dealt with a planning application by
Loch Long Salmon which had been considered by Loch Lomond and the Trossachs
National Park Authority. There were 3 parts to Complaint 2 with a summary of
the complaint and the response from the Community Council detailed at Appendix
3.1 of the submitted report. Complaint 3 related to the conduct of Lochgoil
Community Council as a whole and covered a number of issues relating to the conduct
of the Community Council. There were 7 parts to Complaint 3 with a summary of
the complaint and the response from the Community Council detailed at Appendix
4.1 of the submitted report. In relation to complaint 1, the Panel had further
discussion around the identity of the complainant with specific reference to
point 1.3 noting that if the complainant was a Community Councillor they could
have attended the private meeting. In
terms of the procedure, the Adviser noted that if the Panel were minded they
could request further information to be supplied to assist in their
deliberations. The Panel agreed that
they could make a determination without requesting further information. Following consideration of the 3 complaints before
them, and the determination of whether the Community Council’s conduct was in
breach of the terms of the Scheme of the Establishment of Community Councils,
the constitution of Lochgoil Community Council and the Code of Conduct for
Community Council Members; the Panel were invited to impose appropriate
sanctions as set out in Clauses 13.5.1 to 13.5.3 or Clauses 13.12.3 to 13.12.6
of the Establishment of the Scheme of Community Councils. Decision 1.
The Community Council Conduct
Review Panel having determined whether the Community Council, on the balance of
probabilities, had failed to comply with and abide by the terms of the Scheme
of the Establishment of Community Councils, the constitution of Lochgoil
Community Council and the Code of Conduct for Community Council Members in
relation to each aspect of the 3 complaints before them, agreed the following – Complaint
1
|