Venue: By Microsoft Teams
Contact: Hazel MacInnes, Senior Committee Officer Tel: 01546 604269
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Minutes: There were no apologies for absence. |
|
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
|
Additional documents:
Minutes: He advised that his first task would be to establish if the
Members of the LRB felt that they had sufficient information before them to
come to a decision on the Review. Councillor Brown stated that she felt she had enough information
to come to a decision. She advised that
she had considered requesting a site visit but now felt it was not necessary
due to all the information they have before them. Councillor Wallace stated he would’ve liked more information on
the use of the condition from Planners to establish how widely used it was, but
agreed he had sufficient information to come to a decision. Councillor Blair stated he had similar questions about the use
of the condition advising that it felt presumptuous to add such a condition; if
the applicant wanted to move towards using the property as a short-term let
they would be required to follow the process for this, which was through an
application for a short term let licence and may include a further planning
application for a Change of Use permission.
He advised that, overall, he felt the condition was onerous and that he
was minded to support the removal of it from the permission. Councillor Brown stated that she failed to see why they couldn’t
leave the condition on as the applicant had stated she did not wish to use the
property as a short-term let. Councillor Wallace stated that as the Council had declared a
housing emergency he felt they had a duty to protect available housing under
the National Planning Framework Policy 30. Mr Jackson advised the LRB that they should consider whether or
not they thought the condition was onerous in regard to the application. He explained that if the owner decided in the
future that they wished to use the property as a short-term let they would need
to follow the procedure for that, and the Planners would be consulted as part
of the process. Councillor Blair proposed that the condition be regarded as
onerous and that it be removed.
Councillor Wallace seconded that and Councillor Brown confirmed that she
was also happy to support that given that planning would be consulted in any
future application for a change of use or short-term let licence. Decision The Argyll and Bute Local Review Body, having considered the
merits of the case de novo, unanimously agreed to remove Condition 5 from the
Planning Permission. (Reference: Notice of Review and Supporting Documentation,
comments from interested parties, and comments from Applicant, submitted) |