Venue: Council Chambers, Kilmory, Lochgilphead. View directions
Contact: Fiona McCallum Tel. No. 01546 604392
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Mary-Jean Devon, George Freeman, Audrey Forrest, Graham Archibald Hardie and Roderick McCuish. |
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
CIVIC GOVERNMENT (SCOTLAND) ACT 1982: APPLICATION FOR A STREET TRADERS LICENCE (M BASIM-ALTINAWI, ROTHESAY) Report by Head of Legal and Regulatory Support Minutes: The
Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting and introductions were made. He then outlined the procedure that would be
followed. The
Council’s Solicitor, Mr McMillan, advised that a representation from Rachel Hughes
and an objection from Margaret Colville had been received out with the time
period allowed by the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 for making
objections or representations and advised that it would be competent under
Paragraph 3(2) of Schedule 1 to the 1982 Act for the licensing authority to
entertain a late objection or representation if they were satisfied that there
was sufficient reason for it not having been made within the time allowed. Mr
McMillan advised that both Ms Hughes and Ms Colville were invited by letter to
explain why their representation and objection had been submitted late and that
no response had been received. The
Chair sought the views of Members as to whether or not this late representation
and late objection should be taken into consideration. The
Committee agreed not to take this late representation and late objection into
consideration. Mr
McMillan then advised that a further late objection dated 19 October 2019 had
been received after publication of the Agenda for this hearing from Tim and Ann
Saul. Mr McMillan advised that the
objectors were unable to attend the hearing today but had explained in an email
that the reason for their late objection was because they had been away on
holiday and had missed notification of this application. They advised that they had only become aware
of the application when the Agenda for this meeting was published. The
Chair sought the views of Members as to whether or not this late objection
should be taken into consideration. Motion To
agree to take the late objection into consideration. Moved
by Councillor Richard Trail, seconded by Councillor Lorna Douglas Amendment To
agree not to take the late objection into consideration. Moved
by Councillor Rory Colville, seconded by Councillor Alastair Redman The
Motion was carried by 5 votes to 4 and the Committee resolved accordingly. A copy of the late objection from Tim and Ann
Saul was circulated. A list of the
standard conditions for Street Trader Licences was also circulated for
information. The
Chair then invited the Applicant to speak in support of his application. APPLICANT With
the aid of an interpreter Mr Basim-Altinawi described the types of food he
would sell and the locations where he was applying to trade from. He pointed out that negative responses from
local businesses were very common. He
explained that in general people have encouraged him to go ahead. He advised that most of his food would be
vegetarian based. Referring to the
objections received he said that he would not park anywhere that would affect
other shops. He said that he did not
wish his business to affect other businesses.
He confirmed that he would be happy to respond to any questions. OBJECTORS Ms
Crowe referred to the objection dated 19 September 2019 which had been
submitted by Wm Skelton and Co on behalf of Colin Brooks, the proprietor of the
Electric Bakery. She advised that his
objection was based on two points. The
first of these was in respect of the right to trade from the access road behind
Squat Lobster. She advised that the
Council gardens there had become a welcome feature of the town centre and there
was a concern that having a van situated there would have an adverse effect on
the amenity of the area due to an increase in rubbish and waste which, she
said, would want to be avoided given the attractiveness of the area. She advised that the gardens were well
maintained by the Council and their appearance was a contributory factor in the
repeated success of Bute in Bloom which was awarded a Beautiful Scotland Silver
Gilt Award. She advised that the
presence of a van in this area would have a detrimental effect on the area and
a detrimental effect on existing nearby businesses offering carry out food. She
said that this would lead to an overprovision of carry out outlets in the area
especially between the hours of 9 am – 5 pm. She
advised that the second aspect of the objection related to the right to trade
on High Street. She pointed out that it
was not clear from the information that had been provided where on the High
Street the van was applying to trade.
She advised that it was not clear if it was for the whole street or for
just part of the street. She advised
that there would only be an objection if this included the area between
Victoria Street and Castle Street. She
referred to there being limited car parking at this area and that there would
also be access issues for emergency vehicles at this location. She also referred to numerous existing
business which supplied carry out food between 9 am and 5 pm and advised that
this section of the High Street was not suitable for the conduct of a mobile
hot food carry out business as it would cause an overprovision. MEMBERS’ QUESTIONS Councillor
Colville sought and received clarification from Mr McMillan that the Isle of
Bute was not classed as an economically fragile area but the town of Rothesay
was and, therefore, exemption from condition 17 did not apply in this case. Councillor
Colville sought and received confirmation from the Applicant that he was
applying for two licences – one for a permanent location and the other for
various locations. He advised that the
permanent location would be near to the ferry. Councillor Colville asked the Applicant if he was aware that if he was applying to trade at a permanent location this would be planning permission for the site and not for planning permission for one particular person. He pointed out that this meant anyone could use the site. Mr Basim-Altinawi advised that it was his understanding that no one else was going to use ... view the full minutes text for item 3. |