Venue: By Microsoft Teams
Contact: Fiona McCallum Tel. No. 01546 604392
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Minutes: An apology for absence was received from Councillor Paul Kennedy. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee 20 April 2022 Minutes: The Minute of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee held on 20 April 2022 was approved as a correct record. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CIVIC GOVERNMENT (SCOTLAND) ACT 1982: TAXI DRIVER/PRIVATE HIRE CAR DRIVER MEDICALS PDF 276 KB Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Legal and Regulatory Support Minutes: The Committee agreed on 23 March 2022 to consult private hire/taxi drivers and operators to seek their views on the proposed amended procedure for taxi/private car driver medicals. A report detailing the responses received to this consultation was before the Committee for consideration. Decision Having regard to the consultation responses, the Committee agreed to adopt the new procedure for medicals whereby the medical would be carried out by a private company at a central location with the cost being paid by the Council. (Reference: Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Legal and Regulatory Support dated 19 May 2022, submitted) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth Additional documents:
Minutes: The Development Manager spoke to the terms of the report and to supplementary report number 1 which referred to 2 late representations from the Friends of the Sound of Jura and a response from the Applicant which provided further clarification on the risk to wild swimmers and bath medicine treatments. The application site is located in the Firth of Lorn off the coast between Dunbeg and Ganavan, north of Oban. A fish farm has been operating in this location since 1987. The current site at Dunstaffnage comprises 9 x 80m circumference cages in a 50m mooring grid with an associated 80 tonne feed barge. This would be replaced by 14 x 100m circumference cages in a 75m mooring grid and a 300 tonne feed barge. The biomass would increase by 1050 tonnes to a new maximum biomass of 2350 tonnes. The application has been subject to 29 objections, 1 petition, 1 representation and 28 expressions of support. Many of the objections relate to fish farming in general rather than being site specific. Objections were also received from Argyll and District Salmon Fishery Board and Fisheries Management Scotland. A summary of all representations received is contained at section D and F of the report of handling. All of the objections have been addressed fully in the report and having regard to the approved guidance for hearings, it is considered that a hearing would not add value to this assessment. The recommendation on this application has been guided by the conclusions of the Environmental Impact Assessment report and the proposal has been assessed against the policies of the adopted Argyll and Bute Local Development Plan (LDP). It is considered that the proposal complies with the LDP and it was recommended that planning permission be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed in the report. Motion To agree to grant planning permission subject to the conditions and reasons numbered 1 – 12 in the report of handling and subject to the amendment of Condition 13 which should be augmented to include provision for the monitoring of the dispersal of discharge of hydrogen peroxide into waters, with feedback from this monitoring exercise incorporated into a communications plan in order to inform marine users of potential risks to human health in the vicinity of the fish farm. The final wording of condition 13 to be delegated to the Head of Development and Economic Growth in consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee. Moved by Councillor Kieron Green, seconded by Councillor Graham Hardie. Amendment To agree to continue consideration of this application until SEPA release its new sea lice regulatory framework so that the Committee can make an informed decision on the cumulative impact the expansion may have. Moved by Councillor Luna Martin, seconded by Councillor Mark Irvine. A vote was taken by calling the roll. Motion Amendment Councillor John Armour Councillor Mark Irvine Councillor Jan Brown Councillor Luna Martin Councillor Audrey Forrest Councillor Kieron Green Councillor Daniel Hampsey Councillor Graham Hardie Councillor Fiona Howard Councillor Andrew Kain Councillor Liz McCabe Councillor Peter Wallace The Motion was carried by 10 votes to 2 and the Committee resolved accordingly. Decision The Committee agreed to grant planning permission subject to the conditions and reasons numbered 1 – 12 in the report of handling and subject to the amendment of Condition 13 which should be augmented to include provision for the monitoring of the dispersal of discharge of hydrogen peroxide into waters, with feedback from this monitoring exercise incorporated into a communications plan in order to inform marine users of potential risks to human health in the vicinity of the fish farm. The final wording of condition 13 to be delegated to the Head of Development and Economic Growth in consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee. (Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 7 June 2022 and supplementary report number 1 dated 21 June 2022, submitted) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Councillor Amanda Hampsey rejoined the meeting at this point, having lost Wi-Fi connection to the meeting prior to the vote being taken on the foregoing application. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth Additional documents: Minutes: The Development Manager spoke to the terms of the report. The proposal seeks detailed planning permission for a development comprising three dwellinghouses and two flatted dwellings located within the ‘settlement area’ of Ardminish, Isle of Gigha. The proposal is considered to be of appropriate location, scale, design finishes, and does not give rise to any concern in relation to infrastructure, services or to its compatibility with surrounding land uses. The application has been subject to representation from ten individuals who have raised objection to the proposals, and also concern raised by Gigha Community Council about the prospective loss of land for recreational purposes. However, the site itself is currently in agricultural use and is not identified in the Local Development Plan as either a formal recreational facility or an Open Space Protective Area. The land use planning related issues are not considered to be unduly complex and, as such, it is considered that a fully informed assessment and determination can be made with reference to this report. The proposal is considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of the Local Development Plan and there are no other material considerations of sufficient significance to indicate that it would be appropriate to withhold planning permission having regard to Section 25 of the Act. It was recommended that planning permission be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed in the report. Decision The Committee agreed to grant planning permission subject to the following conditions and reasons: 1.
The
development shall be implemented in accordance with the details specified on
the application form dated 25th May 2021 supporting information and,
the approved drawings listed in the table below unless the prior written
approval of the planning authority is obtained for an amendment to the approved
details under Section 64 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.
Reason: For the purpose of clarity, to ensure that the development is implemented in accordance with the approved details. 2.
Notwithstanding
the provisions of Condition 1, the proposed access shall be formed in
accordance with the Council’s Roads Standard Detail Drawing SD08/004 rev A
(min. access width 5.5m) and visibility splays of 2.5 metres to point X by 75.0
metres to point Y from the centre line of the proposed access. The access shall
be surfaced with a bound material in accordance with the stated Standard Detail
Drawing. Prior to work starting on site the access hereby approved shall be
formed to at least base course standard and the visibility splays shall be
cleared of all obstructions such that nothing shall disrupt visibility from a
point 1.05 metres above the access at point X to a point 0.6 metres above the
public road carriageway at point Y. The final wearing surface on the access
shall be completed prior to the development first being brought into use and
the visibility splays shall be maintained clear of all obstructions thereafter. Reason: In the interests of road safety. 3.
The
parking and turning area shall be laid out and surfaced in accordance with the
details shown on the approved plans prior to the development first being
occupied and shall thereafter be maintained clear of obstruction for the
parking and manoeuvring of vehicles. Reason: In the interest of road safety. 4.
The
refuse collection area shall be laid out and surfaced in accordance with the
details shown on the approved plans prior to the development first being
occupied and shall thereafter be maintained as such. Reason: In the interest of road safety. 5.
Notwithstanding
the provisions of Condition 1, no development shall commence until details of
the intended means of surface water drainage to serve the development have been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. The duly approved scheme shall be implemented in full concurrently with the development that it is intended to serve and shall be operational prior to the occupation of the development and maintained as such thereafter. Reason: To ensure the provision of an adequate surface water drainage system and to prevent flooding. 6.
No
development shall commence until a scheme of boundary
treatment, surface treatment and landscaping has been submitted to and approved
in writing by the Planning Authority. The scheme shall comprise a planting plan
and schedule which shall include details of: i)
Existing and proposed ground levels in relation to an identified
fixed datum; ii)
Existing landscaping features and vegetation to be retained; iii)
Location design and materials of proposed walls, fences and gates; iv)
Proposed soft and hard landscaping works including the location,
species and size of every tree/shrub to be planted; v)
A programme for the timing, method of implementation, completion
and subsequent on-going maintenance. Planting proposals shall include additional hedge planting
along the northern boundary of the site in so far as this might practicably be
accommodated on the land available. All of the hard and soft landscaping works shall be carried
out in accordance with the approved scheme unless otherwise approved in writing
by the Planning Authority. Any trees/shrubs which within a period of five years from
the completion of the approved landscaping scheme fail to become established,
die, become seriously diseased, or are removed or damaged shall be replaced in
the following planting season with equivalent numbers, sizes and species as
those originally required to be planted unless otherwise approved in writing by
the Planning Authority. Reason: To assist with the integration of the proposal with
its surroundings in the interest of amenity. 7. Notwithstanding the effect of Condition 1, no development shall commence until written details of the ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A short comfort break was taken at 12.10 pm and the Committee reconvened at 12.15 pm. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth Additional documents: Minutes: The Planning Officer spoke to the terms of the report. The proposed development comprises small scale housing development on an existing residential site bounded on three sides by residential development and located within the Key Settlement of Clynder/Rosneath as identified in the Argyll and Bute Local Development Plan 2015 (LDP). A total of 20 representations have been received from interested third parties. One of these supports the proposal and 17 are objections. The remaining 2 representations raise planning issues but are neutral in terms of support or objection. There are no objections to the proposal from statutory consultees. It is considered that the proposed development is in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Argyll and Bute Local Development Plan and that the material land use planning issues arising are not unduly complex. As such, it is not considered that a hearing would add value to the determination process. It was recommended that planning permission be granted subject to the conditions detailed in the report. Decision The Committee agreed to continue consideration of this application to their next meeting in August 2022 and instructed Officers to request that the Applicant provide by the end of July 2022, an engineering report on the ground engineering works required to ensure stability of the sloping ground to prevent any slippage or flooding onto neighbouring properties. (Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 8 June 2022, submitted) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth Additional documents: Minutes: The Development Manager spoke to the terms of the report. The site with currently appears to be rough grazing land measures less than 1 hectare and is located to the west of the electricity sub station at Ardnadam and to the south of Ardnadam Farmhouse. It is advised that the generating capacity would be no more than 50MW and access would likely be taken from the north east of the site although at this stage this is indicative only. The report sets out the information submissions to date as part of the Proposal of Application Notice (PAN) and summarises the policy considerations, against which any future planning application is likely to be judged against any potential material considerations. It was recommended that Members have regard to the content of the report and submissions and provide such feedback as they consider appropriate in respect of the PAN to allow any matters to be considered by the Applicant in finalising any future planning application. Decision The Committee noted the content of the report and submissions with no further feedback being provided. (Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 7 June 2022, submitted) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FQ4 2021/22 - DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH SERVICE PDF 293 KB Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Development and Economic Growth Additional documents: Minutes: A report presenting the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee with the FQ4 2021/22 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the Development and Economic Growth Service was considered. Decision The Committee reviewed and scrutinised the FQ4 2021/22 KPI report as presented. (Reference: Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Development and Economic Growth dated May 2022, submitted) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee, at their meeting on 20 April 2022 agreed to continue to this application to a site visit and discretionary pre-determination public hearing in light of the significant volume of representation raising matters relating to planning both in support and opposition to the proposed development. A report advising that the Applicant has subsequently withdrawn this planning application and that a formal determination of this application by the planning authority was no longer required, was before the Committee for information. Decision The Committee noted the contents of the report. (Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 1 June 2022, submitted) |