Primary school amalgamation proposals go to formal consultation
Argyll and Bute councillors have voted to consult formally on eleven primary school amalgamation proposals.
The council has 80 primary schools, with the capacity for around 11,500 pupils. Currently there are approximately 5,500 vacant places and predictions show the number of vacancies is expected to increase.
School rolls have reduced to unsustainable levels in a number of areas and the council’s proposals focus on the educational benefit for pupils at those schools.
At the same time some school buildings need huge investment to bring them up to an appropriate standard.
The cost of educating pupils in Argyll and Bute ranges from £3,000 per pupil per year to almost £30,000 per pupil per year.
The following proposals are now subject to a period of statutory consultation:
- St Kieran’s Primary School to Castlehill Primary School
- Ardchonnel Primary School to Dalmally / Kilmartin Primary Schools
- Toward Primary School to Innellan Primary School
- Skipness Primary School to Tarbert Academy
- Clachan Primary School to Tarbert Academy
- Rhunahaorine Primary School to Glenbarr Primary School
- Minard Primary School to Furnace Primary School
- North Bute Primary School to Rothesay Joint Campus
- Luss Primary School to Hermitage Primary School
- Achaleven Primary School to Dunbeg Primary School
- Ardchattan Primary School to Lochnell Primary School
The council agreed not to take forward to formal consultation the proposals to merge Ashfield Primary School with either Tayvallich Primary School or Lochgilphead Joint Campus.
Councillors rejected a proposal to amalgamate Minard Primary School with Lochgilphead Joint Campus, preferring the alternative option to amalgamate Minard Primary School with Furnace Primary School.
And councillors also rejected a proposal to amalgamate Achaleven Primary School with Lochnell Primary School, preferring the alternative option to amalgamate Achaleven Primary School with Dunbeg Primary School.
Councillor Ellen Morton, spokesperson for education and lifelong learning said:
“Argyll and Bute Council is committed to providing a quality education for all of its school children. If we are going to provide an equitable and sustainable education for all then we have to make sure our resources are used to the best effect.
“Running schools which are half full or less and where predictions show the roll is likely to decrease is not a sustainable position. These are not easy decisions to make and I understand that those communities which are directly affected are not in favour of the proposals but we have to take a long term view and consider education in the whole of Argyll and Bute.
“If agreed, these proposals will have a direct impact on 137 pupils, in the schools that may close. We have around 5800 primary school children and we must consider how to deliver the best education for all of them.
“We have already held pre-consultation meetings with communities and have included their comments in our proposals. Everyone now has a further opportunity to have their say as part of the formal consultation process before further decisions are made by council in October.”
-ends-
Notes to editors
The outline timetable for the statutory consultation is:
Action | Target date |
Council agrees to statutory consultation of revised proposals | 19 April 2011 |
Printing and distribution of consultation papers | 20 April – 2 May 2011 |
Start of consultation period | 3 May 2011 |
End of consultation period | 30 June 2011 |
Draft consultation report prepared and submitted to HMIE | 15 August 2011 |
HMIE submits comments on draft report | 9 September 2011 |
Council published consultation report | 30 September 2011 |
Council decision to accept or reject consultation report recommendations | 28 October 2011 |
Potential for representations to the Scottish Government (3 weeks) | 18 November 2011 |
Scottish Government (3 week call-in period) | 9 December 2011 |
End Call in period | 9 December 2011 |
Implement amalgamations | During December recess |
The table below shows the potential savings and the current school roll of the schools proposed for amalgamation
COMMUNITIES | SAVING TOTAL | PROJECTED PUPILS ROLLS (11/12) – DEMITTING SCHOOLS/ PLACING REQUESTS IN **** | |
St Keirans to Castlehill | £0 * | 0 | 0 |
Ardchonnel to Dalmally/ Kilmartin | £0 * | 0 | 0 |
Toward to Innellan | £61,340 | 21 | 10 |
North Bute to Rothesay JC | -£34,252 ** | 54 | 27 |
Skipness to Tarbert | £59, 609 | 3 | 0 |
Clachan to Tarbert | £35,605 *** | 8 | 2 |
Rhunahaorine to Glenbarr | £28,781 | 11 | 0 |
Minard to Furnace | £58,574 | 10 | 4 |
Luss to Hermitage PS | £58,524 | 19 | 3 |
Achaleven to Dunbeg | £38,963 | 8 | 0 |
Ardchattan to Lochnell | £80,209 | 3 | 0 |
*No saving is shown for St Kierans or Ardchonnel as the budget is non operational at present
**The North Bute PS proposal to Rothesay JC shows a net cost of £34,252. The council received a competitive tender for essential property works around £450,000. This sum sits within a wider estimate by the council’s facility service of required works to bring the property up to a grade A standard of £807, 477.
A 20 year loan of £450,000 from the Public Works Loan Board would cost the council around £35,000 on an annuity basis (using the loan calculator, it is estimated at £64,794 per annum for a loan of £807,000) to factor in repayment as well as interest costs. The North Bute proposal would therefore provide a net saving to the council of around £30,542 per annum over 20 years if the proposal was implemented.
Following a meeting arranged with Cllr Scoullar and the council’s facility services, the Parent Council have very recently submitted some details on an alternative specification of works. This submission will be discussed at a meeting this month and its viability will thereafter be formally assessed by facility services as with all alternatives that are suggested through community consultation.
*** The Skipness and Clachan amalgamations with Tarbert would generate a saving of £118,980 if both were progressed together (ie the saving would be greater than the sum of the two individually)
**** Projected roll figures and placing request figures as at March 2011 – these may be subject to variation.
You can read the individual proposals on the education website.

Request it
Report it
Pay it
Have your say